Run checks before onboarding, payments, and cross-border transactions. Get explainable results, audit logs, and Evidence Packs ready for bank and procurement review.
Start free and validate the full workflow before you buy: screen, explain, and export evidence.
MatchAudit is not limited to one sanctions list or one intake path. It combines official list coverage, geo screening, and operational import workflows so teams can review real cases without rebuilding their process first.
Screen across global and national authorities, not only the usual headline lists.
Assess where the risk applies, not only who the counterparty is.
Bring operational data into MatchAudit before you build a full API integration.
Built for risk-averse compliance buyers: first show defensible output, then operationalize it.
Run a counterparty and route check before onboarding, payment, or shipment.
Review explainable results and classify each decision as allow, caution, or block.
Export an Evidence Pack now. If requests become recurring, move to a short paid pilot.
Validate the exact output your stakeholders expect: screening context, explainable reasoning, and defensible Evidence Pack exports.
Run one workflow across key subject types and review explainable screening results with confidence context.

MatchAudit is designed to reduce operational friction for operators and risk exposure for decision-makers.
Start free to confirm match quality, Evidence Pack usefulness, and reviewer speed in your real workflow.
Do not pay until you have proof. Start free first, then use a short pilot when repeatability and governance become the bottleneck.
Validate match quality, false-positive handling, and Evidence Pack usefulness.
Operationalize the workflow once your team has proof and clear usage triggers.
Non-banks, PSPs, trade and logistics teams, NGOs, and SMEs that need defensible screening decisions for banks, insurers, partners, and procurement teams.
Results are designed as decision support with explainable match reasons and confidence context. Final legal and compliance judgment remains with your team.
Each result includes why it matched, which source triggered it, and what contextual fields were or were not available, so reviewers can validate quickly and avoid spending time on weak hits.
That is the core outcome: audit logs plus Evidence Pack exports that capture what was screened, what was assessed, what was decided, and why.
Coverage includes UN, EU FSF, OFAC SDN and Non-SDN, US Consolidated Screening List, BIS, DDTC, State non-proliferation programs, the UK Sanctions List and UK proscribed organisations, SECO, Canada, Australia, and selected national lists including France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, and the Czech Republic. MatchAudit also surfaces geo-risk datasets for FATF, territorial, corruption, rule-of-law, and IP/location-based screening workflows.
Yes. Teams can start in the dashboard, run bulk spreadsheet-style workflows, and use the SAP GTS integration path when they need side-by-side reviewable outputs from external operational systems before or alongside API integration.
Yes. MatchAudit supports geo screening by country, territory, region, city, and IP-derived location so teams can triage corridor risk alongside name screening.
Data source transparency and freshness endpoints are available so your team can verify recency as part of controls and escalation procedures.
Screening context, risk dimensions assessed, allow/caution/block recommendation, rationale, source coverage, and timestamps suitable for third-party review.
No. Start in the dashboard first. Spreadsheet and SAP GTS workflows can bridge external operations before full API automation is needed.
Most teams can run a first check and review output in one session after signup.
Start pilot when evidence requests are recurring, more than one reviewer is involved, and you need a repeatable SOP under live constraints.
Fixed scope, success criteria, evidence workflow validation, and a go-live recommendation mapped to the right production plan.
No. The pilot is positioned as risk reduction after free validation, not as a mandatory first step.
Yes. Free signup is the intended starting point for evaluating fit before any paid commitment.
Build trust first with a free workflow run. Use pilot as a controlled operational rollout when recurring evidence demand appears.