Run checks before onboarding, payments, and cross-border transactions. Get explainable results, audit logs, and Evidence Packs ready for bank and procurement review.
Start free and validate the full workflow before you buy: screen, explain, and export evidence.
Built for risk-averse compliance buyers: first show defensible output, then operationalize it.
Run a counterparty and route check before onboarding, payment, or shipment.
Review explainable results and classify each decision as allow, caution, or block.
Export an Evidence Pack now. If requests become recurring, move to a short paid pilot.
Validate the exact output your stakeholders expect: screening context, explainable reasoning, and defensible Evidence Pack exports.
Run one workflow across key subject types and review explainable screening results with confidence context.

MatchAudit is designed to reduce operational friction for operators and risk exposure for decision-makers.
Start free to confirm match quality, Evidence Pack usefulness, and reviewer speed in your real workflow.
Do not pay until you have proof. Start free first, then use a short pilot when repeatability and governance become the bottleneck.
Validate match quality, false-positive handling, and Evidence Pack usefulness.
Operationalize the workflow once your team has proof and clear usage triggers.
Non-banks, PSPs, and SMEs that need defensible screening decisions for banks, insurers, partners, and procurement teams.
Results are designed as decision support with explainable match reasons and confidence context. Final legal and compliance judgment remains with your team.
Each result includes why it matched, so reviewers can validate quickly and avoid spending time on weak hits.
That is the core outcome: audit logs plus Evidence Pack exports that capture what was screened, what was assessed, what was decided, and why.
Coverage includes UN, OFAC, EU, UK, SECO (CH), Canada, and Australia for sanctions workflows, with source visibility and provenance context.
Data source transparency and freshness endpoints are available so your team can verify recency as part of controls and escalation procedures.
Screening context, risk dimensions assessed, allow/caution/block recommendation, rationale, and timestamps suitable for third-party review.
No. Start in the dashboard first. API and automation can be added after workflow validation.
Most teams can run a first check and review output in one session after signup.
Start pilot when evidence requests are recurring, more than one reviewer is involved, and you need a repeatable SOP under live constraints.
Fixed scope, success criteria, evidence workflow validation, and a go-live recommendation mapped to the right production plan.
No. The pilot is positioned as risk reduction after free validation, not as a mandatory first step.
Yes. Free signup is the intended starting point for evaluating fit before any paid commitment.
Build trust first with a free workflow run. Use pilot as a controlled operational rollout when recurring evidence demand appears.