Public sample - no signup required

Sample Evidence Pack

This fictional sample shows the structure a reviewer can expect when documenting a screening review for bank or procurement review.

Evidence summary
Counterparty
Northline Trade Logistics LLC
Route
Antwerp (BE) -> Mersin (TR)
Reviewer status
Escalation recommended
Reason summary
Escalation required due to route and ownership risk indicators.
Reviewer
Compliance Ops - Team A
Timestamp
2026-02-23T11:04:27Z
Why this matters
  • +Gives reviewers a consistent review narrative.
  • +Reduces manual screenshot and spreadsheet assembly.
  • +Supports escalation with defensible, time-stamped context.
What was screened
  • +Entity identifiers and name variants
  • +Route and jurisdiction context
  • +Ownership input (if provided)
What was assessed
  • +Sanctions signal status
  • +Cross-border route risk indicators
  • +Escalation and manual review flags
What was decided and why
  • +Risk indicators for reviewer assessment
  • +Reason-level explanation for reviewer defensibility
  • +Traceable output for bank and procurement discussions